Both deconstructions make good points, though I'm not sure that I agree completely with them. Mostly, I have issues with the Alltel deconstruction.
My first thought when watching the ad wouldn't have been that it was racist, though it is clearly stereotyping immigrants. I would say that the point of the ad is for the viewer to relate to the family who are having to rent out their room, as they are attempting to sell phone plans. I do agree that there is stereotyping of immigrants, though it is never explicitly stated what immigrants we're talking about. I don't see an attempt to make people want to be like the family shown, and not the immigrants, but that they want you to prevent from becoming them by having this phone plan and saving money.
I would have to argue that most companies probably support making profits over customer satisfaction. This ad is not unlike any other for advertising internet service. It could easily be related to HughesNet ads, which focus that they can provide internet service anywhere. In a place like West Virginia, which is mostly rural, this approach is appealing. Having had this internet service, I could also argue that customer satisfaction is not their top priority despite what their ads might say. Therefore, I would imagine that the claim made in this deconstruction is accurate, because internet service won't be able to reach everyone.
/index-2.jpg)
When I saw this ad, it made me laugh, which I believe is the technique being used here. Afterwards, though, I realized what's being said here: that the father has to label his children to know who is who. This is the stereotype we see often, that dads aren't as good as mothers when it comes to their kids. This is completely inaccurate, as mothers could just as easily have difficulty telling the difference between their children.